'The Grinch Who Stole Christmas\r'

'The Grinch who stole Christmas crapper be explained using that Archetypal leap of criticism. Archetypal criticism foc usances on the use of legendology and takes on a very creative aspect to literature. In the Grinch who stole Christmas, the Grinch is the opposer who possesses an active hatred towards Christmas and the citizens of Who-ville.There are numerous questionable sections in the poem that secern it as a myth quite than reality. To begin with, Santa Clause and the Grinch are regions of the imagination, apply in a mythical wizard and never brought to reality. Secondly, the author says â€Å"THENHe loaded whatsoever bags And some old empty sacks On a ramshakle sleigh And he hitched up old Max.”This means that the Grinch was intending to use his dog, max, as a reindeer. It would be physically inconceivable for a dog that puny to take around a sled fill up with Christmas items for hours. Max was also expected to escort the sleigh and heavy Christmas items â€Å"Three cat valium feet up! Up the side of mass Crumpit”, which is a physically impossible job for a dog. Thereafter, the Grinch was expected to climb in and out of chimneys all night, stealing Christmas presents as well as trees. This task is impossible, that one that a fictional character would be able to accomplish. Finally, the author says â€Å"That the Grinchs small heart Grew three sizes that day!” It would be impossible for a heart to let and shrink based on the kernel of love and care that is shown. As you preserve see, the Grinch was meant to be portrayed in a mythical sense. There are legion(predicate) flaws that do not occur with in reality. This poem is meant to be a myth to teach children not to be same(p) the Grinch, and to love and accept everything.\r\n'