'Hardy’s “The Man He Killed” Essay\r'

'Because struggle is a mysterious entity, Thomas Hardy wrote â€Å"The soldiery He Killed” to emphasize the occasional inadequate contend for conflict, and the range of emotions someone whitethorn tactile property afterwards engaging in conflict that an individual powerfulness feel unnecessary, and after taking a persons liveliness-time simply because he was my â€Å" competitor”, especially in the Boers Wars in which the British colonized South Africa, in which this numbers is set. Hardy is able to convey the mite of apprehension and shame however not renouncing his trueness to the crown by using figurative language, and literary elework forcets such as repetition, symbolism, and wordplay.\r\nThroughout the poem the bank clerk is speaking of war, although there is a neglect of funny farm and violence. He refers to war as â€Å"quaint and remarkable”(line 17). That diversitys the idea of war for the endorser, and lures the endorser to feel a lack of necessity for the battle, which is what the narrator feels. â€Å"And staring pose to face, I shot him as he at me, and killed him in his place.” (lines 6-8) There is a recognizable absence of emotion here, as one might feel traumatized or regretful after taking a life, and we know war is not â€Å"quaint and suspect” (line 17). War is meant to be bloody, and chaotic, which in most literature, it is. In â€Å"The mankind He Killed” the altercation seems more resembling an execution or murder than a battle, causing the reader to question whether it was entirelyified or not.\r\nmoreover, repetition is used throughout the poem withal and causes the reader to doubt the domains true cutaneous sensess about war, and what he had done, â€Å"I shot him dead because †Because he was my foe, well(p) so: my foe of course he was; That’s liberate enough; although” (lines 9-12). The causation chose to repeat the words because, and foe t o let the reader know that he had to tick his own self of wherefore he had just killed a homosexual. â€Å"Because †Because he was my foe” (lines 9-10), the dash among the repeated because represents a pause, airing doubt on wherefore exactly he killed the man. He also states â€Å"that’s clear enough” (12) which is ironic because it simply isn’t true. He doesn’t understand why he shot the man; he is enquire why he just took his life beyond him being his foe. It can also be argued that in the narrators series of flushts, these men are interchangeable, â€Å"He though he’d list perhaps, / Off-hand-likeâ€just as I†/ Was out of workâ€had sold his traps†/ No other reason why.” (lines 13-16) It seems as though, out of despondency and lack of monetary funds to support themselves, they two enlisted in order to survive and to support their families.\r\nThe author gives few details about himself, or the man he kil led, but the reader can make from what he does say that these men are genuinely similar, even though they are enemies, which is just what their countries told them, in reality, and in Gods eyes, they are just two men on Planet Earth. Hardy uses several literary elements to convey his ideas. He constructs the poem to emphasize the points he is trying to make. The uses of dashes are the driving force of feeling for the reader, and expose the insecurities the narrator has about what is happening. It is first acknowledge when in the ninth line while tell the word because, it seems as if he is hesitating, unsure of what to say, or if he even believes in what he is saying. Furthermore in the following stanza, he uses several dashes to trouble himself while he creates a scenario for the man he had just taken life away from â€Å"Off-hand-likeâ€just as Iâ€â€Å"(14). Again, emphasizing the similarity amongst the men.\r\nThis happens over in the next line, which brings a sense of realism to the story. The narrator is speaking to the reader, trying to loose what had happened, he doesn’t know these things about the man he had just killed, but he may be feeling guilt about what he had just done. â€Å"Was out of workâ€had sold his traps†/ no other reason why” (lines 15-16). He may be hunting for the offer as to why he shot the man but cannot bump a reason. In the final stanza, the narrator adopts his emotionless, lack of sensitivity character and states how â€Å"quaint and curious war is!”(line 17). and it seems as though he has moved on from the fiasco, but not without some deep popular opinion about they mans life he had taken away. The poem begins and ends in a draw a blank, where friendships are made or sometimes broken. Unfortunately, this friendship was broken before it had a chance to begin, and the narrator is forced to only cipher if they had â€Å"wet right many a nipperkin” (line 4) which is to take a dr ink together.\r\nHardy in â€Å"The Man He Killed” does a wonderful job exposing the insecurities of the man, without even stating them by using figurative language and literary elements. The repetition deduces hesitation, while other elements such as wordplay, and the use of dashes represents deep sentiment, and possibly regret lets the reader infer how the man is really feeling which is divers(prenominal) from the words on the page. Taking a life whether in war, by accident, or on purpose is bound to have effects on you for the await of your life. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and other factors can change how someone acts and feels, especially after war. The narrator is having a hard to coming to reality, and continually attempts to justify his actions. He infers a question of why he essential kill this man, or if in another stake they could sit down at a bar together and have a good time. This thought obviously troubles the man.\r\nHardy, Thomas. â€Å"The Man He Kil led.” Perrine’s belong and Sense: An Introduction to Poetry. By Greg Johnson, Thomas R. Arp, and Laurence Perrine. Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2013. 683. Print.\r\n'