Homosexuality in the Film Latter Days and in Sexual Perversion by Nagel

From the assigned readings and film, I matte that I deal gained a better understanding on atomic number 53 of the most controversial types of relationships, sapphicity. The topic of homosexuality isnt easy to openly talk about but it is important as philosophy students, to have an open-mind about topics that we dont partake in. Doing so allows us to sanction new ways of thinking about the world around us and see them in a whole new light. In this private response paper, I will discuss homosexuality in connective with the film Latter Days to determine why a homosexual relationship can meet Kants criteria for unimpeachable love as mentioned in artifices essay, Is Homosexuality Bad Sexuality?, as well as why it qualifies as a complete and level-headed relationship as described by Nagel in Sexual Perversion.Michael Ruses essay revolves around the central question if homosexuality is an acceptable form of relationship. In order to help answer this question, Ruse examines this channel from multiple philosophical perspectives, mainly the categorical imperative and utilitarianism. The first honest framework is Kants categorical imperative. According to this theory, a person should not use another for their own benefit or the benefit of others because population must(prenominal) be treated as subjective worthy beings in their own right (Ruse, 1995, pg.113). This means that in a relationship, one must not treat the other as a means to the fulfillment of their sexual desires (e.g. as a sexual object). Instead, there must be respect for the dignity of the other. By giving oneself reciprocally by tractable oneself, body and soul one shows respect for the other as an force out and not just as a means (Ruse, 1995, pg. 113). In doing so, gibe to Kant, there woul... ...ity was something that I never really took the time to think about but after reading the essays and watching the film, I have new respect for homosexuality. I know its only a result of op inion, but I do genuinely feel that homosexuality is thence an acceptable way for people to act and that there is nothing pervert with it.Works CitedNagel, T. (1995). Sexual perversion. In R. Stewart (4th Ed.), philosophical Perspectives on Sex and rage (pp. 105-112). New York, New York Oxford University Press, Inc.Ruse, M. (1995). Is homosexuality bad sexuality?. In R.Stewart (4th Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Sex and Love (pp. 113-123). New York, New York Oxford University Press, Inc.Schaefer, J. & Tibbles, K. (Producers), & Cox, C.J. (Director). (2003). Latter old age Motion picture. United States Funny Boy Films & Davis Entertainment Filmworks.