History of the Fall of Rome

History of the Fall of RomeHesham AlsadiqFor hundreds of age, the roman pudding st sensation faced many challenges from within and without. Rome was neighbored by to a greater extent powerful offers. The date of the rise and pass along of Rome is debatable. Historians acquire alike identified varied causes. Some believe that the top of Rome label the beginning of the middle Ages. 235-284ADAge of loony bin.In 184 AD, a good emperor moth moth named Marcus Aurelius died. He was succeeded by his son Commodus, who led the treasury into bankruptcy. This was the beginning of chaos in Rome. In 192 AD, Commodus troops assassinated him. The armies of the imperium also attacked all(prenominal) other as they differed on the ideal emperor. Because of these internal wars, repeated attacks by neighboring tribes were successful. Had they been united to fight their enemies, perhaps the roman letterss would be able to exemplify themselves. The institution of many emperors within a short span of years indicates the political instability and division that existed in Rome.1285-305 ADTetrarchy and civil wars.In 284 AD, General Diocletian became emperor. Some form of stability was restored during his dominate. He divided the roman print conglomerate into two for easier governance, the east and westbound Empires. Each emperor had a junior co-emperor. The Empire was control by four emperors during this period, each dominion having his own territory. Diocletian secured the borders of the pudding stone, increased the number of provinces and made the armies larger2.Although Diocletian managed to bring some stinting and political stability to the empire, imposing elevated taxation on the roman types caused them to endure faith in their rulers. The persecutions were also unfair to the Christians. The wars at the end of his reign undid the change he brought and were an expense to the empire.2306-363 ADEstablishment of Christianity.In 312 AD, Constantine became empero r in the East. He won several civil wars and later emerged as the ruler of the entire empire3 in 324 AD. He tried to reinforce Diocletians policies. He established Christianity as the official religion and caused the Christian persecutions to cease. As the Romans embraced Christianity, they began depending on religious drawing cards for guidance and did not recognize the authority of emperors. Constantine also created a capital for the empire in the East. As a result, the eastern Empire thrived more than the West in culture and economic offset. Constantine died in 337AD.Constantines favoring of the East made the Western Empire weaker. Poor economic growth results in inflation and inability to defend a region from extraneous attacks.3378 AD Battle of AdrianopleThere was civil war until Theodosius I succeeded Constantine. In the late 300s AD, Germanic tribes began to invade the Roman Empire. They sought better living conditions and fled due to attacks by the Huns, warriors from cen tral Asia4. In 378 AD, the Visigoths defeated the Romans at Adrianople. The Eastern Roman emperor, Valens, was killed. Theodosius defeated the Western ruler and became the emperor. To end the long-standing battles with the Visigoths,Theodosius allowed them to live in the empire. He attempted to use Christianity to bring unity to the empire.4Once the Roman Empire became a target for attacks, its fall was inevitable. Although the emperor tried to detect peace, this was not lasting. The defeat at the battle demonstrated Romes weakness.395 AD last(a) Split of the empire.In 395 AD, after Theodosius death, the division of the Roman Empire became final. His sons, Arcadius and Honorius, ruled the East and West respectively. Honorius was nine years old and incompetent. He was manoeuvre by a talented general named Stilicho5. Arcadius was eighteen and had co-ruled the Eastern Empire ten years earlier with his father. They ruled each of their regions separately, marking the unchangeable spli t of the empire.Placement of young men in positions of power attenuate the leadership of the empire. The empire was also stronger when it existed as a unit. This split created a loophole for attacks.5401-454 AD Attack and capture of Rome.Although they lived in the Roman Empire, the Visigoths faced hostility, high taxation, and prejudice6. They failed to trust the new emperors and had recognized their weakness. In 410 AD, under the guidance of their leader Alaric, they attacked Rome. They destroyed massive properties owned by the Romans. In an attempt to intervene, Stilicho purposed to gist forces with the Visigoths to defeat the Huns. He was beheaded when suspected to be a traitor.The empire became extremely trimmed by these attacks. By this time, it was only a point of time before the empire fell. Fair treatment of the Visigoths might have prevented the attack.AD476 The fall of the Emperor of RomeOther groups continued to invade the empire. In 455 AD, a Germanic tribe known as the Vandals raided Rome. In 476 AD, the Western emperor Romulus Augustus was defeated by a German soldier named Odoacer6. Odoacer declared himself king, marking the end of the Western Roman Empire. The Eastern Roman Empire lasted another thousand years. With a barbarian as the ruler of the West, the initial identity of the Roman Empire was now destroyed. There were no factor to rebuild the empire.The rise of Christianity stands out as the main factor alter to the end of the Roman Empire. When the empire started, Christianity was not recognized. When Constantine was emperor, he was actively abstruse in Christian policy-making. Theodosius made it a state religion during his reign. These emperors were pursuit a means to unify the empire. This religion being monotheistic was real much unlike the traditional polytheistic Roman Religion. The change was drastic. numerous resources were utilized in trying to enforce Christianity as a state religion.Families gave their daughters away to become nuns. This caused a great population decline. The Christians refused to join the armies as rituals were involved routinely. They also freely gave a portion of their income to the church as part of their religious practices, causing a diversion of wealth. Christian persecutions added to the already existing internal conflicts in the empire. The strife made the Romans unable to face up wars from external forces.Church leaders became influential in the governance. They used apocalyptic books for guidance to leaders on how to succeed in wars. The Roman muckle began depending on these leaders for guidance instead of trained military and administrative leaders. The Romans had previously revered the emperors as gods. With the popularity of Christianity and belief in one God, the emperors were little influential.The fall of Rome, however, was not caused by a single event. Such factors as the division of the empire into two, inflation, economic instability, and military problem s also contributed. The multiple invasions weakened the military defenses and led to the eventual dethronement of the emperor.4th September, 476 AD seems as the date Rome ceased to exist. This is when the Western Roman Emperor was dethroned and no one else was declared emperor.BibliographyJones, A. H. M. October 1955 the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. History 40, no. one hundred forty (1955) 209-226.Ferrill, Arther. The fall of the Roman Empire The military explanation. capital of the United Kingdom Thames and Hudson, 1986.Jones, A. H. M. October 1955 the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. History 40, no. 140 (1955) 209-226.Williams, Stephen. Theodosius The empire at bay, London Batsford, 1994)Gibbon, Edward. History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Volume 2. depressed Unicorn Editions, 2001.1 Jones, A. H. M. October 1955 the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. History 40, no. 140 (1955) 209-226.2 Ferrill, Arther. The fall of the Roman Empire The military exp lanation. London Thames and Hudson, 1986.3 (Jones, A. H. M. October 1955 the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. History 40, no. 140 (1955) 209-226.)4 (Williams, Stephen. Theodosius The empire at bay, London Batsford, 1994)5 (Williams, Stephen. Theodosius The empire at bay, London Batsford, 1994)