Landlord and tenant in the uk Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

Landlord and tenant in the uk - Essay ExampleThe paper starts by distinguishing mandate from troth, and makes a number f comments relating to the recent literature on tenant participation in particular. It is argued that there is a need for a more rigorous examination f dominance processes, and in the following member an attempt is made to devise a typology f such processes which is completely different from any typology f tenant participation processes. This typology is then applied in the following sector to important recent developments in Britain which have involved, or have been claimed to involve, the empowerment f residents. Specific nitty-gritty f empowerment which are considered include the provision f information, the passing f legislation, the commitment f resources, and the transfer f management functions. The final section f the paper then briefly discusses the implications f the arguments on empowerment for the development f communities and the changing role f hous ing management.As Harrison (1995,p. 22) points out, empowerment clearly means more than ... participation, but it may be worth considering just how much more empowerment does involve. People may embark individually or collectively in an military action without thereby experiencing any increase in their control over their lives. This can happen if those who control that activity simply want to use the participation for their own ends. For example, they may want to make themselves hefter informed on a subject f which the participants have additional knowledge, or they may merely want to go through the motions f participation without taking seriously the participants contributions. They may want to promote an image f themselves as listening to the people but without any real commitment to the empowerment f those people. Participation without empowerment is therefore a confidence dissembling performed by the controllers f an activity on participants in that activity. To the extent t o which the trick works, it must be disempowering rather than empowering. Those who take this cynical approach, however, should bear in brainiac the arguments f Foucault (1980), to the effect that simply entering into discussion about what can or cannot be done is itself an empowering process, so that those who initiate participation, even with disempowering intent, may strike themselves forced or influenced to act in ways which they had not originally intended. Bearing in mind the above caveat, there is in fact a good deal f overlap between participation and empowerment. For example, mechanisms for consultation clearly involve the participation f those consulted, but the participants are also empowered to the extent to which attention is paid to their views and concerns. This argument is obviously stronger with regard to the forms f participation where participants can hold decision makers to account for what they do and where participants have close to say in the decision maki ng process itself. In these cases, the specificity f